AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Google doodle pixel deminsions2/19/2023 ![]() ![]() (I'm sure there are other ways to do the same thing.) It is definitely 600 pixels wide and 300 high. Using Microsoft Snipping Tool I can take a screenshot of it, as a way to approximately measure the dimensions of the image as I'm seeing it. I can now see my new chart here in the browser - I'm on 100%/normal zoom by the way. I refresh AccessPoint in my browser (hard refresh for the sake of thoroughness, Ctrl+F5), and open the QVW. I use the Qlikview Management Console to run a task that reloads and distributes this QVW to the AccessPoint directory. ![]() Let's say I specify width 600 and height 300 (pixels). I care about precise layout, so after defining my dimensions, expressions, etc, I go to the Chart Properties, 'Caption' tab, and specify an exact Width and Height for the chart object. The exact nature of the chart is totally unimportant. Let's say I use the Qlikview Desktop client to place a chart in a QVW. It isn't a new problem, but seeing Simon's post prompted me to corroborate.Įdit: I've done some more investigation into this and have some more detail about exactly what is happening, although still not why. This doesn't appear to be browser-specific it certainly happens equally using Chrome and IE 11. It's only when the QVW is opened via Accesspoint in a web browser that the quality degrades - the exact same QVW file that Accesspoint uses, but opened in desktop client, is fine. Turning on WebView in the QlikView desktop client does not reduce the image quality. Text objects seem to be fine (and possibly some other object types) but charts degrade in quality significantly, just like in Simon's screenshots. I can't help answer this but I've also got the exact same problem. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |